I’m Not a Lumberjack and I’m Not Actually OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back
Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of those two tales of violence happened in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video streaming web sites, where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either it was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific devices. When dealing with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this really is one worker who keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very peaceful man. He just wandered in extremely calmly with an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and control of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The second of the two stories is a bit more terrifying, while the axe was wielded perhaps not at the slots, but at a member of the employees at a shop that is betting the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a state of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant using the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police described as a ‘quantity of cash,’ while the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over royal vegas fun play who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is pertaining to the idea that neighboring communities will be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have a chance to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the first place. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of the handful of prospects whom have suggested that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that would be based in East Boston, for example.
When it comes to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston areas.
‘The Wynn proposal ended up being voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed benefits.’
According to the state laws that produced the chance for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed if the gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t arrive at a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed going for a path that isn’t really outlined in the 2011 casino law when it comes to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power within the whole vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston world survey discovered that six associated with eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in favor of it, with only two coming away against it (with Conley and one other candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by the state while the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, addititionally there is a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising celebrity of the UK’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the recreations book cookie jar after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading sports company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nonetheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double criteria.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood streets of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there is certainly concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling with betting shops and pay day loan companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says a very important factor in public areas and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nonetheless, fighting back the corner associated with the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna claimed that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect with the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for company, as well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
Even though Goulden is not any longer a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a completely innocent contribution or not, and whether or perhaps not the Conservative Party that are searching to destroy the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his local constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this year his workplace ended up being accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.